Two Papers, One Message: Transparency Matters in Forensic Science
My articles on forensic independence and toxicology testing errors are currently among the most downloaded in Forensic Science International: Synergy.
I was pleased to learn that two of my recent articles are currently featured among the most downloaded papers on the Forensic Science International: Synergy website.
Both articles address issues that I believe are central to the future of forensic science: scientific independence and transparency in forensic testing.
The first article, “Truth, Power, and the Crisis of Forensic Independence,” examines the tension that exists when forensic laboratories operate within law enforcement hierarchies.
When scientists challenge institutional narratives or expose systemic problems, the response is not always scientific debate. Sometimes it is professional retaliation or marginalization. The article argues that true scientific integrity requires institutional independence, transparency, and protection for those who raise legitimate concerns.
The second article, coauthored with Chuck Ramsay, “Errors in Toxicology Testing and the Need for Full Discovery,” reviews toxicology failures across multiple jurisdictions over several decades.
Errors include calibration issues, reporting mistakes, laboratory misconduct, and failures in disclosure. The paper argues that broader discovery and transparency are essential safeguards for both science and justice.
I appreciate the attention these topics are receiving and look forward to continuing to write about issues at the intersection of science, law, and forensic practice.