The Science of Toxicology Testing

The Science of Toxicology Testing

Share this post

The Science of Toxicology Testing
The Science of Toxicology Testing
The 0.02 Agreement Criteria in Breath Alcohol Needs to be Reconsidered
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

The 0.02 Agreement Criteria in Breath Alcohol Needs to be Reconsidered

The 0.02 agreement criteria doesn't scale with concentration and shouldn't be used to charge a person with a test refusal.

Aaron Olson's avatar
Aaron Olson
Mar 24, 2023
∙ Paid

Share this post

The Science of Toxicology Testing
The Science of Toxicology Testing
The 0.02 Agreement Criteria in Breath Alcohol Needs to be Reconsidered
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Share
Upgrade to paid to play voiceover
three clear beakers placed on tabletop
Photo by Hans Reniers on Unsplash

Many states have duplicate agreement criteria for breath alcohol samples.

If the samples vary by too much from one another this could mean that one or both of the samples are contaminated with mouth alcohol.

Mouth alcohol ≠ refusal

In the state of Minnesota, both samples must be within 0.02 g/210L of each other. Another test must be performed if the samples fall outside of this range.

If, on the second test, the samples fall outside of the 0.02 g/210L criteria again, the officer will often charge with a refusal.

The justification for this is that MN law states:

“Two deficient breath tests, as defined by paragraph (d), constitute a refusal.” (MN Statute 169A.51.5)

In MN, refusals come with harsher penalties than if one had a valid breath test above 0.08 g/210 L.

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Aaron Olson
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More