The Science of Toxicology Testing

The Science of Toxicology Testing

Share this post

The Science of Toxicology Testing
The Science of Toxicology Testing
How Should Breath Alcohol Measurements Be Reported? An Interview with A.W. Jones
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

How Should Breath Alcohol Measurements Be Reported? An Interview with A.W. Jones

A case for reporting the average result with a deduction for uncertainty.

Aaron Olson's avatar
Aaron Olson
Feb 22, 2023
∙ Paid

Share this post

The Science of Toxicology Testing
The Science of Toxicology Testing
How Should Breath Alcohol Measurements Be Reported? An Interview with A.W. Jones
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Share
Upgrade to paid to play voiceover

In Minnesota, breath alcohol measurements are reported by taking the lower of the two measurements and truncating the third digit. So a 0.083 becomes a 0.08 g/210L. At first glance, this might seem to benefit the person taking a breath test.

The problem with this practice is that there is no scientific rationale for it, and it arbitrarily benefits some people more than others based on chance.

For example, a person who blows a 0.079 and a 0.099 gets a final value of 0.07 g/210L. That person benefits greatly by taking the lower sample and truncating the third digit. They will not have their license automatically rescinded based on the results. They get a deduction of 0.019 from their average breath result of 0.089 g/210L.

In another example, a person blows a 0.080 and a 0.080. Taking the lower of the two samples gives 0.08 g/210L as the final result. In this case, the person will automatically have their license suspended despite having a lower average result (0.080 g/210L) than the first example!

A more rational way to report breath alcohol

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Aaron Olson
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More