Errors in Toxicology Testing and a Surprising Honor
There is a growing recognition of the need for transparency in forensic science.
I recently received some unexpected and welcome news. My article, Errors in Toxicology Testing and the Need for Full Discovery, co-authored with Charles Ramsay, was featured on the Most Downloaded list on Forensic Science International: Synergy’s website.
Seeing our article recognized among the most downloaded pieces is both humbling and gratifying. It shows that this topic resonates with people who care about accuracy, fairness, and scientific integrity.
Why We Wrote the Article
During nearly two decades in forensic toxicology, I have seen how much the outcome of a case can depend on the smallest details. Calibration records, control charts, and data interpretation all play a role. A small oversight can mean the difference between an accurate conclusion and a serious mistake with real consequences.
Chuck and I wrote the article to draw attention to a persistent problem. Even experienced experts can make errors when the information provided in discovery is incomplete.
Defense attorneys often receive limited data, missing key materials such as raw results, method validation reports, or quality control documentation. Without those, it is difficult to properly evaluate the reliability of a test result.
Our goal was to encourage a stronger culture of transparency.
Why Transparency Matters
Toxicology is a science rooted in numbers, but those numbers do not exist in isolation. Results must be interpreted in context, taking into account the analytical process, the assumptions made, and the method's limitations.
When discovery is incomplete, that context can be lost.
Transparency protects the integrity of the science and helps ensure that legal decisions are fair and evidence-based. It benefits both the laboratory and the justice system as a whole.
A Broader Conversation
The fact that this editorial has become one of the most downloaded articles tells me that many in the forensic community are ready to talk more openly about these issues.
Quality assurance, discovery practices, and data transparency are central to the credibility of forensic toxicology.
A Personal Note
I am truly honored by this recognition and grateful that people are reading and sharing the article.
Thank you to everyone who has read, shared, and discussed the article!
You can read the full paper here:
👉 Errors in Toxicology Testing and the Need for Full Discovery (Forensic Science International: Synergy, December 2025)