The Science of Toxicology Testing

The Science of Toxicology Testing

Another Win for Science

A jury came back with the verdict of Not Guilty after hearing me testify about the limitations of the DMT breath alcohol analyzer.

Aaron Olson's avatar
Aaron Olson
Nov 10, 2023
∙ Paid
2
2
Share

jury trial

Earlier this week, I testified in a DWI trial involving mouth alcohol, measurement uncertainty, interfering substances, and the minimum requirements for a valid breath.

Here’s what Jacob Birkholz had to say about the case:

Aaron testified, and the jury soon returned: Not Guilty on all counts. Hiring Aaron was essential to winning our case. He wrote a thorough report and is a credible expert who can withstand cross-examination.

He explained the problems with mouth alcohol, measurement uncertainty, and interfering substances. He communicated complex scientific facts in a way the jurors could understand. He was excellent on the stand. I won’t hesitate to hire him again.

Here’s the details of the case:

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Aaron Olson
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture