The Science of Toxicology Testing

The Science of Toxicology Testing

Share this post

The Science of Toxicology Testing
The Science of Toxicology Testing
Another Win for Science
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Another Win for Science

A jury came back with the verdict of Not Guilty after hearing me testify about the limitations of the DMT breath alcohol analyzer.

Aaron Olson's avatar
Aaron Olson
Nov 10, 2023
∙ Paid
2

Share this post

The Science of Toxicology Testing
The Science of Toxicology Testing
Another Win for Science
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
2
Share

jury trial

Earlier this week, I testified in a DWI trial involving mouth alcohol, measurement uncertainty, interfering substances, and the minimum requirements for a valid breath.

Here’s what Jacob Birkholz had to say about the case:

Aaron testified, and the jury soon returned: Not Guilty on all counts. Hiring Aaron was essential to winning our case. He wrote a thorough report and is a credible expert who can withstand cross-examination.

He explained the problems with mouth alcohol, measurement uncertainty, and interfering substances. He communicated complex scientific facts in a way the jurors could understand. He was excellent on the stand. I won’t hesitate to hire him again.

Here’s the details of the case:

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Aaron Olson
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More